Background
Shortly before the administration of Kaupthing Singer &
Friedlander Limited (In Administration) (KSF), the
Financial Services Authority (the FSA) issued a
supervisory notice to KSF, requiring it to:
- open a segregated trust account at the Bank of England (the
Account);
- place moneys equivalent to the aggregate value of deposits
accepted from its customers on October 2 and October 3 2008 in the
Account; and
- credit the Account with a cash amount greater or equal to the
value of any subsequent deposits accepted.
KSF was responsible for administering the Account and the Joint
Administrators of KSF (the Joint Administrators)
took over this role in their capacity as agent of KSF. At the
time of the administration, the Account held over £147 million.
The FSA initially required the notice to be kept confidential
for the purpose of assisting in the smooth administration of
KSF. For this reason, the Joint Administrators were not able
to provide information about the Account to creditors at an early
stage. The Joint Administrators informed the creditors'
committee of the Account as soon as they were able to do so after
the confidentiality restrictions were lifted and they have
continued to keep the creditors' committee informed of any
developments.
Application to Companies Court
In February 2009, the Joint Administrators applied to the court
for directions on how the funds in the Account should be
distributed. A number of parties were appointed to represent
various categories of account holder with different interests. The
Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) and
Her Majesty's Treasury were also joined, as those parties wished to
argue that they had an entitlement to the funds in the Account
because they had funded the transfer of certain KSF customer
accounts - known as Edge accounts - to ING Direct NV, as required
by the Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Limited Transfer of
Certain Rights and Liabilities Order 2008.
The hearing in the Companies Court was heard in May 2009 and
judgment was handed down on 10 July 2009. Each of the parties
(other than the Joint Administrators) appealed that decision and
the appeal was heard in March 2010. Judgment of the Court of
Appeal was handed down on 27 May 2010.
Court of Appeal decision
On appeal, the lead judgment was given by Lord Justice Lloyd,
who held as follows:
- The words 'deposit' and 'customer' in the FSA Supervisory
Notice bore their statutory meaning from theFinancial Services and
Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities Order) 2001. The money held
in the Account was held on trust for 'customers' that had made a
'deposit' (as both terms were defined in the order).
- Where an account holder had deposited funds and KSF had made a
matching payment to the Account, but should not have done so
because either the customer or the deposit did not fall within the
respective definition in the order, KSF obtained an interest in the
Account in respect of that payment, provided that all beneficiaries
of the trust other than KSF have received their entitlement in
full.
- Where an account holder had deposited funds, KSF had made a
matching payment to the Account and the account holder had later
withdrawn funds, KSF was entitled to reimbursement from the funds
in the Account in respect of the moneys used to fund the
withdrawal, provided that all beneficiaries of the trust other than
KSF have received their entitlement in full.
- If a shortfall in the trust arose from the fact that KSF had
not transferred funds in respect of all deposits received from
customers during the period, all persons with an interest in the
moneys in the Account were entitled topro ratashare in those moneys
and KSF would receive no funds in respect of withdrawals or other
payments.
- Any interest that Edge account holders held in the Account was
assigned to the FSCS by reason of theKaupthing Singer &
Friedlander Limited Transfer of Certain Rights and Liabilities
Order. The judge stated that he would not have upheld an
alternative argument made by Her Majesty's Treasury and the FSCS
based on subrogation, which would have achieved the same result as
a transfer of the Edge account holders' interests. Lord
Justices Sedley and Thomas agreed with the judgment, but chose not
to express a view on the subrogation argument.
Application to the Supreme Court
Transport for London represented KSF's unsecured creditors at
the initial hearing and the appeal. Transport for London
filed an application with the Supreme Court for permission to
appeal the judgment of the Court of Appeal in respect of the
question of whether the interest of Edge account holders was
transferred to the FSCS. The Supreme Court dismissed the
application
Distribution of the Account funds by the Joint
Administrators
The Joint Administrators, in conjunction with KSF staff, carried
out a reconciliation process in respect of deposits made during the
period to ascertain persons who were entitled to payment from the
Account and the amount to which they were entitled. This
process was concluded in June 2011 and the Joint
Administrators have subsequently contacted those persons who were
entitled to payment from the Account, in accordance with the
directions of the Court.
The reconciliation identified that the Account was overfunded in
the amount of approximately £13 million. Accordingly, these
funds were repaid to KSF.
The significant majority of the remainder of the funds have been
distributed to those parties identified as having an entitlement to
payment from the Account.
The majority of parties identified as being entitled to payment
from the Account had submitted non-preferential claims in the
administration in respect of their entitlement and had been paid
dividends on their claim. Accordingly, prior to providing
those parties with the full amount of their claim to funds in the
Account, it was necessary to deduct an amount representing
dividends previously received by those parties in respect of their
claim to funds in the Account. Those amounts were deducted
and repaid to the estate of KSF. The total amount paid to KSF
from the Trust account in this respect was approximately £81
million.
If you consider that you have an entitlement to the funds held
in the Account but have not received notification from the Joint
Administrators you should contact them directly.